Conners 3AI™

Assessment Reports provide detailed information about scores from a single administration, presented both numerically and graphically. An individual's scores are compared to those in the normative sample and elevations at the scale and subscale level are indicated.
Progress Reports compare the results of two to four administrations for the same individual to measure changes over time. These reports are ideal to use when monitoring treatment and intervention effectiveness.
Comparative Reports combine the results of different raters to provide an overview of an individual's scores from a multi-rater perspective. This highlights potentially important inter-rater differences in scores.

The reliability of the Index forms has been addressed in several studies. Reliability estimates are based on scores that were extracted from full-length Conners 3 administrations. The Conners 3AI  reliability studies include evaluation of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and standard error of measurement.

The mean adjusted inter-rater reliability for the Conners 3AI was .85

Age and gender significantly affect the scores on the Index forms, therefore the norms are broken down by age and gender.